Earth Bound Homes · In Production · Performance Data

Encanto
Passive House

The Buelow Residence in Palo Alto, modeled by Emu Passive through their Project Boost program (Report EBH008, March 26 2025). The model compares the project's baseline design against three energy-performance scenarios — Good, Better, and Best — to chart the path to the Passive House Institute (PHI) standard. Every number below comes directly from that report.

Encanto Passive House — front rendering
Project
Buelow Residence
Location
Palo Alto, CA
Type
New Construction · Single Family
Modeled by
Emu Passive · PHPP

Best-case Passive House performance

1.50kBTU/sfy
Annual heating demand
Best scenario · vs PH limit ~4.75
7.9kBTU/h
Peak heating load
vs 26.5 for code baseline
7.2kBTU/h
Peak cooling load
vs 10.1 for code baseline
2,290kWh / y
Total site energy
heating + cooling, Best scenario
Emu Project Boost Score Card

Four scenarios,
one decision matrix.

The Emu Boost report compares the project's code-built baseline against three increasingly efficient envelope-and-glazing packages: Good, Better, and Best. Lower is better.

Annual Heating Demand  ·  kBTU / sfy

ScenarioHeating Demandvs Baseline
Baseline11.91
Good4.43−63%
Better3.10−74%
Best1.50−87%

Annual Cooling Demand  ·  kBTU / sfy

ScenarioCooling Demand
Baseline2.11
Good1.98
Better2.10
Best2.34

Peak Heating Load  ·  kBTU / h

ScenarioHeating Load
Baseline26.5
Good10.8
Better9.1
Best7.9

Peak Cooling Load  ·  kBTU / h

ScenarioCooling Load
Baseline10.1
Good7.5
Better7.2
Best7.2

Total Site Energy  ·  kWh / y  (Heating + Cooling)

ScenarioTotal Site Energyvs Baseline
Baseline7,110
Good3,220−55%
Better2,590−64%
Best2,290−68%

Indoor Air Quality  ·  cfm / person

ScenarioPer Person Vent. Rate
Baseline12.0
Good19.0
Better19.0
Best19.0
Project Verification — Headline Numbers

What the Best-case scenario buys you

Compared to the project's code-built baseline, each metric below shows how much performance the Best scenario unlocks.

Heating Demand Reduction
−87%
From 11.91 down to 1.50 kBTU/sfy
Peak Heating Load Reduction
−70%
From 26.5 down to 7.9 kBTU/h
Site Energy Reduction
−68%
From 7,110 down to 2,290 kWh/y
Fresh Air Improvement
+58%
From 12.0 up to 19.0 cfm/person — above the IAQ adequacy threshold
Project Specifications

The model inputs

Building geometry, climate and modeling conditions used in the PHPP run for the Buelow Residence.

Building & Site

Project nameBuelow Residence
CityPalo Alto, CA
Building typeSingle-family residence (new construction)
Energy modelPHPP (validated to ASHRAE Standard 140)
Modeling firmEmu Passive — Denver, CO
ReportEBH008 Boost Report v3.0 — March 26, 2025
Modeled scenariosBaseline · Good · Better · Best
Target standardPHI Passive House (Classic / Low Energy Building)
Active cooling included in modelYes (with ERV summer-bypass for night cooling)
Form factor target2.5 – 3.5 (single-family ideal range)
Project Team

The people behind the numbers

Owner / Client
Buelow Family
Palo Alto, CA
Energy Modeling & Boost Report
Emu Passive
445 N Broadway, Denver, CO · emupassive.com
General Contractor
Earth Bound Homes
Bay Area, CA · Certified B Corp
← Back to project gallery